Skip to main content
 
Announcements Announcements
New to Edgenuity? Check out the most essential materials to get started.
Edgenuity Help Center

Edgenuity Implementation Guide to Ensuring Academic Integrity

Frequently Asked Questions

What should I do if I come across a site that has Edgenuity answers?

Please contact Edgenuity's Support team with the specific URL that shows the Edgenuity content. We will work with our security team to remove the links as quickly as possible.


Learn more about ensuring academic integrity through Edgenuity.

 

Watch the recorded webinar to learn additional skills and tips on ensuring academic integrity in the classroom. 

Prevalence of Cheating

Data indicates that cheating is major issue in American schools. From fall 2002 to spring 2015, the International Center for Academic Integrity surveyed more than 70,000 American high school students about cheating in 2017 and found that:

  • 64% of survey respondents admitted to cheating on a test
  • 58% admitted to plagiarism
  • 95% said they participated in some form of cheating, whether it was on a test, plagiarism, or copying homework

Edgenuity believes academic integrity is a non-negotiable to guaranteeing high-quality, meaningful learning. However, with the proliferation of websites dedicated to posting answers to assessment questions, ensuring academic integrity can be difficult. Fortunately, research has uncovered several, evidence-based strategies that teachers, administrators, and curriculum providers can take to ensure school work is completed honestly.

  • Clearly Define Academic Integrity

Studies indicate that student misunderstandings about academic integrity and the concept of plagiarism contribute to an increase in digital cheating (Ma, Lu, Turner, & Wan 2007). One of the best ways to make sure students are honestly completing their schoolwork is to articulate what is appropriate conduct and what constitutes cheating. If students understand how to complete their work without plagiarizing or cheating, many of them will make sure to avoid doing both.

As researchers McCabe & Trevino (1993) note, a school’s “ability to develop a shared understanding and acceptance of its academic integrity policies has a significant and substantive impact on student perceptions of their peers’ behavior. Thus, programs aimed at distributing, explaining, and gaining student and faculty acceptance of academic integrity policies may be particularly useful” (p. 533-534).

Bottom line: Schools should engage with teacher, parents, and students alike to reinforce how to set expectations. For example, do teachers explicitly explain that looking up answers during a test is cheating?

  • Set Expectations Collaboratively with Staff

We would encourage all schools to engage their staff in a discussion of the kinds of expectations they have set with students about cheating behavior. Do teachers explicitly explain that looking up answers during a test is cheating? What are the consequences when students do it? Are those consequences made clear to parents/guardians and students from the start of the year?

We believe that the most effective way to prevent cheating is to manage the students instead of attempting to manage the technology. When we try to design tools to stop students from cheating, all we teach them is to look for other ways to cheat. Given the number of stories we hear every day about professionals who lie on their resumes, academics who falsify their data, and corporate leaders who make questionable financial choices, it's clear that we're not doing enough in the early years to help students understand and value integrity.

Bottom line: This is a perfect opportunity to help students understand what the school defines as cheating, and what the consequences will be should cheating occur in the classroom. 

  • Establish an Honor Code

Research shows that students who attend schools with honor codes are less likely to cheat. However, to be most effective, the honor code must be well implemented and strongly embedded into student culture (McCabe & Trevino, 2002).

Bottom line: The honor code should encourage the development of good character and outline specific deterrents to cheating (e.g., clear penalties that are meaningful to students).

  • Set Consequences and Hold Students Accountable

When students perceive high levels of cheating by their peers and a lack of punishment for cheating, they are more likely to cheat themselves (McCabe, Trevino, & Butterfield, 2001). An honor code doesn’t mean anything if there aren’t any appropriate consequences for when students break it. Schools must develop fair and consistent grading policies and procedures, remove opportunities to cheat (e.g., monitor tests, be sure there is ample space between test takers), punish transgressions in a fair and timely manner. Students need to understand what could happen should they choose not to adhere to the honor code. What are the consequences when students do it? Are those consequences made clear to parents/guardians and students from the start of the year?

Bottom line: Continually communicate classroom expectations, and hold students accountable to their own learning through clearly a clearly defined honor code.

Customize an Honor Code into the course that students must agree to before progressing to a test or exam. Edgenuity has created two sample honor codes that teachers can use in his/her classroom: 

  • Address Peer Culture

Research shows that peer culture plays a large role in why students cheat.  Data indicate that when students perceive high levels of cheating by their peers, they are more likely to cheat themselves (McCabe, Trevino, & Butterfield, 2001).

Bottom line: Address any instances of cheating right away and apply the consequences set out by the classroom honor code and student contract.

  • Foster Strong Connections to Students

Research shows that students are more likely to cheat when they perceive their instructor to be less concerned about them and think they are physically father away from the classroom (Stuber-McEwen, Winseley, & Hoggatt, 2009). To discourage cheating, experts recommend teachers develop a strong presence—either online or offline (Stuber-McEwen, Winseley, & Hoggatt, 2009).  When teachers get to know students personally it promotes student respect. When students respect their teacher they are less likely to cheat.

Bottom line: Continue to foster a positive, honest classroom with open dialog and mutual respect for one another.

  • Use Digital Tools

We recommend that Edgenuity users:

What Should I Do If Edgenuity Answers are Found Online?

This is regrettable. Please send the direct links to our Support team. We will work with our security teams to have this content removed. We also actively scrub the internet for Edgenuity questions and answers, although sometimes it's tough to stay ahead of the students. We appreciate the extra hand from our fellow educators that notify us of the websites and content submissions we have missed.

Additional Items

Find additional information on Academic Integrity on our website.

References

  • International Center for Academic Integrity. (2017). Statistics. Retrieved from https://academicintegrity.org/statistics/
  • Ma, H., Lu, Y., Turner, S., & Wan, G. (2007). An empirical investigation of digital cheating and plagiarism among middle school students. American Secondary Education, 35(2), 69-82.
  • McCabe, D. & Trevino, L. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 552-538.
  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L., Butterfield, K. (2001) Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research, Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.
  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L., & Butterfield, K. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357-378.
  • Stuber-McEwen, D., Winseley, P., & Hoggatt, S. (2009). Point, click, and cheat: Frequency and type of academic dishonesty in the virtual classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(3).
  • Was this article helpful?